"All in all, I know some of you are happy to help developers keep the game fresh with new content, but I feel that Federations isn't delivering enough for the money."ĭespite a few negative votes, the basic tenor in most ratings for Stellaris: Federations remains positive. In addition, "the Federation mechanics and the Juggernauts did not have a major impact on the game." He tends to close his rating negatively and gives a thumbs down: Some federations are also "really unique", but the addon would have problems with the balance in multiplayer. The user has the feeling that "the origins are the real highlight". Player Lugerluver, on the other hand, cannot really make friends with Stellaris: Federations. A positive voice from me to encourage them to maintain this standard for future releases. The decision not to rush the product seems to be paying off here for Paradox. ( ' raile's and hoi - is, Beriemor department. "I only played for a few hours but haven't found any game breaker bugs yet. Clinines, inetalnines, and iron steel industry, fata : ity rates in.
Player Kronpas writes in his Steam review: The response to Steam is largely positive, as of now, 759 of 409 users give a thumbs up. According to the developer Paradox, "significant improvements" were made here.Īs the game duration and complexity of the relationships between the star systems progress, Stellaris tends to join in annoying stutters and long loading times to annoy. The free update 2.6 "Verne" also addresses one of Stellaris' biggest criticisms: The Endgame performance. Stellaris: Federations focuses on non-warlike interaction with other races.
0 kommentar(er)
